I also have served on the board of directors for a benefits trust, and in that position spent considerable time reviewing various employee health insurance plans. Although I know far more about health insurance now than before I joined that board, I am by no means an expert on health insurance or health care.
So why do so many folks on radio and television think they are? They are hardly specialists when it comes to most subjects, but when they open their mouths, they expect everyone to accept what they say as fact. That holds true for the current discussions on health care reform.
Not long ago, my husband received the following e-mail message from a friend, who happens to be the publisher of several medical, pharmaceutical, and biomedical publications in Canada. He gave us permission to present his comments, which I am doing so unedited:
I caught a moron named Glenn Beck on the radio. No doubt you've seen him on TV. Horrible piece of sewage. What does it say about the broadcasting industry that they put a defective like this on public display? Anyway, he's explaining to a caller how healthcare works in Canada: "They have a lottery, and if you win the lottery, you get to have medical treatment."While I don't believe every Republican or every Democrat or every political partisan is a monster or saint or what-have-you, Mitch makes a very valid point about what category people fall into when they choose to outright lie to scare people into believing something that isn't true. To pretend you have to somehow come up with a golden ticket to get your GI tract checked if you live in a country like Canada has no basis in reality. Neither does the myth of no choice being perpetuated.
You could write a book about the problems in healthcare here and, fool that I am, I did. But the GOP and its flunkies are offering LSD-fueled fantasies about how a single-payer system operates. Last night I caught Lynn Cheney (!) telling Larry King that you can't choose your own doctor in Canada. The ignorance, the deception, the insistence that poor people need to die from their illnesses, and the middle-class need to be impoverished when they get sick: what manner of monsters are these Republicans?
And the same goes for the scores of other lies being tossed about to persuade people that reform is evil, that reform is a shortcut to no care and certain death, and that reform will result in everyone losing employer-provided insurance.
Enough. Get the facts. They are available. Just don't go looking to people whose "facts" are fiction and are presenting wholly biased views masquerading as expertise. They are barely one step up from the snake oil salesmen of the past, whose elixirs were surefire cures for everything that ailed you but more likely made you sick. That's what they would like you to think single-payer systems or universal care or public options would do. You owe it to yourself to get a second opinion -- from an expert.
These people do not fear-monger and hate-speech just for fun. It's for the benefit of some fat cats some where. Probably some business or industry. So they convince some susceptible, or less informed group that some awful fate awaits them if this change happens.
ReplyDeleteThis is an incredibly cynical thing to do. They prey upon all these people, for example those senior citizens in my old stomping grounds of Delaware, that were shown on Larry King. They were booing and heckling their own Republican US Congressman (and former Governor), Mike Castle. And what were they up in arms about? Obama's birth certificate and Cap and Trade. I will not even dignify the first item with any comment. Yes, I said Cap and Trade. They've been convinced it will mean dramatically higher taxes, and that they need to do something about it. Who knows what Cap and Trade will do to taxes once it ever gets going? There are dozens of things going on that affect these seniors, but, some fat cat will make a TON of money if Cap and Trade fails.
Then, try to drill down to the facts with someone who has been convinced by these actors. I think I use some variant of the 'scientific method', basically to get to some fact-based source material. Usually, they don't want to hear it! Otherwise intelligent people, who have managed people and departments, raised families, solved countless problems, etc., and they have no capacity for an inquiry that may challenge their beliefs.